Coca Colas Corporate Communication Strategy

coca Colas embodied confabulation Strategy1. INTRODUCTIONCommunication is the medium by means of which companies both erect and sm each(prenominal) access the vital resources they need to operate ( van Riel 1995). Without effective and compound talk systems an face will be unable to develop an inhibit structure for its unified conference strategy. Given that its incarnate communicating entails selectively communicating the brass instruments views and objectives to its stakeholders (whom it relies on for the success of its business), it can therefore be expound as a key commission strategy.This report will critically assess Coca Colas incarnate Communication strategy by dint of the evaluation of converse frame defecates and specimens. It will look at the national structure of Coca-Colas institution and how the higher(prenominal) society utilises collective converse strategies to both epitomize their in incarnated individuation to stakeholders and improve th eir temper. It also looks at the corporate ethics and culture of the fol first-class honours degree and the imp spot of embodied Communication steering on the memorial tablet1.1 accentuate InformationThe Coca-Cola keep companyCoca-Cola was invented on May 8, 1886, in Atlanta, Georgia by Dr. tail end Stith Pemberton. It was first offered as a spirt deglutition by mixing Coca-Cola syrup with carbonated water. Coca-Cola was then patented in 1887, when round other Atlanta pharmacist and businessman, Asa Candler bought the formula for Coca Cola from inventor John Pemberton for $2,300. It was registered as a trademark in 1893 and by 1895 it was being sell in every state and territory in the United States.By the late 1890s, Coca Cola was iodin of Americas most popular fountain drinks, largely due to Candlers aggressive selling of the product. With Asa Candler, now at the helm, the Coca Cola Company increased syrup sales by oer 4000% between 1890 and 1900. In 1899, The Coca-Col a Company began franchised bottling operations in the United States. today the Coca-Cola Company operates in more(prenominal) than 200 countries and markets nearly 500 brands and 3,000 beverage products. The company employs over 92,400 associates creationwide and has a consumer serving (per day) of nearly 1.6 billion, with a net operating revenue of over $31.9billion (as of December 31, 2008). Throughout the world today, no other product is as immediately recognizable by its brand as Coca-Cola. (www.thecoca-colacompany.com.html, 2009)2. CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONCorporate refers to complete, entire or total entities of the organization, enchantment communication means to im billet, sh ar or involve common. Therefore, corporate communication can be defined as a total communication of the organization or integrating different messages of organizations infra one banner (Christensen et al. 2007).Van Riel and C. Fombrun (2006, p.25), cite Jacksons (1987) definition of corporate communi cation as the total communication activity generated by a company to achieve its planned objectives. That total communication represents all the different forms of communication that is occurring deep down the organization, including marketing, managerial and organizational interaction. An organisation such as Coca-Colas corporate communication strategy plays an central role in aiding stakeholders get winding of the organization and communicating the organizations identity.Corporate communication within an organization is essential for the death penalty of strategic objectives, build brand and reputation and thereby pull in frugal value. It is therefore a set of activities convoluted in managing and orchestrating all internal and outside communications aimed at creating favourable starting points with stakeholders on whom the companies front (Fombrun and van Riel 2006).Freemans (1984, p. 46) stakeholder commence defines stakeholders as any group or individualistic who c an affect or is affected by the achievement of the firms objectives. The stakeholders of The Coca-Cola Company (see Figure 3 below), includeconsumers,customers,suppliers,employees,government and regulators,NGOsThe topical anaesthetic communitiesStrong centralize functions with direct connection to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is the best stylus for a company to ensure the success of its corporate communication function. (Argenti, 1998). This was homely in Coca-Cola Company, under the leadership of the former CEO Douglas Ivester whose highly formalized, centralized organizational structure, with clear hierarchy of authority and a mechanistic attention process has helped maintain control and drive aggressive marketing and elaboration plans. This management structure was criticized by the external communities, claiming that the companys perspective was too ball-shaped and ignored the local communities. chthonic the direction of the companys new CEO, Coca-Cola began decentra lizing some of its activities in order to become more localized. Increased horizontal communication is now occurring within the organization. Sutherland and Can intumesce (2004, p.130) define horizontal communication as on the loose(p) communication between peers or colleagues on the same level of the organizational structure. Coke immediately began realizing economies of scale and scope, as well as low-cost production from a globalization strategy that enables product design, manufacturing and marketing to be standardized throughout the world.Corporate communication if strategically implement within an organisation helps build favourable corporate reputation, which in spin is influenced by corporate identity, behaviour, symbolism and has an impact on organizational performance (van Riel and Balmer, 1997). fit in to Argenti (1998) corporate communication frame contrive below (Figure 2), an organization communicates to its stakeholders through messages and images, who then respon d by associating themselves with that particular organization. It affects the perceptions of stakeholders about the organizations prospects and so influences the resources that would be available to them (Fombrun and van Riel, 2006). Image, Identity and Reputation, Crisis Management, fellowship traffic and Corporate Ethics, Employee Relations and clement Resource Management (HRM) are all essential functions of an organization that depend on effective corporate communication to be successfully implemented.2.1 Image, identity and reputationCorporate identity is the reality and uniqueness of an organization, which is integrally related to its external and internal image and reputation match to olden and Balmer (1998), and is a means to achieve a competitive payoff (Schmidt, 1995), while the Image of a company is the reflection of the organizations reality. It is the corporation as seen through the eyes of its stakeholders (Argenti, 1998). Corporate image has 3 dimensionsRelationa l dimension birth the company has with the government, the local community and its employeesManagement dimension what the corporate goals, decision-making processes, companionship management and understanding of company objectivesProduct dimension product smiler and support, competitive advantage and promotional distinctiveness.Coca-Colas corporate communication strategy within the company includes conducting stakeholder analysis to understand their individual stakeholders needs and attitudes. This involved a series of focus groups with consumers aged 18 and over and with employees of the Coca-Cola Company. It also include interviews with customers, non-governmental organizations and the media. The consistent use of the colours red and white, the lettering and the warning-wave over metre is an integral part of the companys corporate visual identity and is important to all stakeholder groups.If managed effectively corporate reputation can be a important asset that sacrifice s an organization more resilient in todays competitive environment. Corporate reputation is influenced by the way in which the company projects its image via behaviour, communication and symbolism (Gotsi and Wilson, 2001, p. 30).It is a multi-stakeholder construct that can be used to eyeshade how effective an organizations communication system is (Fombrun and van Riel, 2006). When information that stakeholders need to make a decision about a company is insufficient, they will sometimes turn to the reputation of that company to seal the decision.2.2 Crisis management and cultureAccording to Jones (2000), a good reputation acts as a buffer to companies in times of crisis. After over 200 people, including school children reported stamp unwell in 1999 Coca-Cola was forced to issue recall of its soft drinks in countries in Western Europe including Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Luxembourg (Taylor, 2000).Taylor (2000) explained in his courting correction that a companys public transaction and communication strategy should be penalise on a global scale. He did this using Hofstedes (1980) theory of cultural dimension, which explained how values are influenced by culture in differing nations. Taylor (2000) proposed that in countries with high uncertainty avoidance and high power distance, citizens reacted more strongly to this tainting crisis, by forcing the government to place bans on the sale of Coca-Cola related products, while the governments of countries with low uncertainty avoidance and low power distance did non rightfully react to the crisis.Culture management was also needed to accurately understand the environment they were embarking on. Cultureconsists in those patterns relative to behaviour and the products of human action which whitethorn be inherited, that is, passed on from generation to generation independently of the biological genes (Parson, 1949 p. 8).Under the guidance of the new CEO, the company adopted a think local, act local get to marketing, which highlighted the importance of addressing the cultural needs of customers in the local market. Daft maintained the view that although Coca-Cola is a global brand, customers do not drink Coca-Cola globally. As a result, Coca-Cola has been adopting a localized strategy in marketing, advertising, and public transaction by carrying out extensive stakeholder analysis as seen in Figure 3. The company also adopted a insecurity management approach that includes financial, operational, societal, environmental and ethical considerations and are of the view that by puting these risks and the potential consequences they could have on the business, they can proactively focus on these areas and identify ways to more effectively manage their impact on their operations.2.3 Community relations and corporate ethicsCoca-Cola is now working to become a model citizen by reaching out to local communities and getting involved in civic and charitable activities. Like reputation, corp orate ethics and blood with the external stakeholders is very important for building a positive image. Coca-Colas social state and corporate ethics helps build company integrity. In 1960, Keith Davis suggested that corporate social responsibility refers to business decisions and actions taken for reasons at least part beyond the firms direct economic or technical interest. Stakeholder management is important here as it reconciles the companys objectives with the claims and expectations being made by them of various stakeholder groups.2.4 Employee relations and kind Resource ManagementHuman Resource Management (HRM) is one of the most important forms of management within an organization and effective communication is essential for HRM to be successful. HRM is as defined by Bratton and Gold (1999)that part of the management process that specializes in the management of people in work organizations. HRM emphasizes that employees are critical to achieving sustainable competitive adv antage, that human resources practices need to be integrated with the corporate strategy, and that human resource specialists help organizational controllers to take on both efficiency and equity objectives.The Coca-Cola Company links employee (internal) communications and employee relations and believe that they are integral components needed for the success of the organization. Employee Relations, according to Heery and twelve noon (2001), involves the body of work concerned with maintaining employer-employee relationships that contribute to satisfactory productivity, motivation, and morale. Essentially, Employee Relations is concerned with preventing and resolving problems involving individuals, which arise out of or affect work situations. The employees are the most valued internal stakeholders, as they communicate the product to the companys external stakeholders. Internal Corporate Communication falls under the organizational management department, as seen in van Riel (1995 ) model of integrated corporate communication. It is defined, according to Welch and Jackson (2007) as communication between an organisations strategic managers and its internal stakeholders, in the case of Coca-Cola, its employees designed to agitate commitment to the organisation a sense of be to it awareness of its changing environment and understanding of its evolving aims. The Coca-Cola Company follows a sympathetic structure regarding internal communication as depicted in Welch and Jacksons (2007) model (Figure 2). Within the company, corporate messages relayed directly to employees aid in reinforcing employee commitment towards the boilersuit organizational objectives. On the same level, direct communication between managers and their employees helps create a sense of belonging to the organization. This sense of belonging then motivates employees to promote awareness and understanding of the corporate brand to the external stakeholders.Guest (1990), in his approach to stra tegic HRM draws on the Harvard model (proposed by Beer et al., 1984), which was associated with the softer side HRM and the dough model (proposed by Fombrun, Tichy and Devanna, 1984), which proposes the hard HRM approach. Hard HRM see human resources as mainly a factor of production, an expense of doing business rather than the lone(prenominal) resource capable of turning inanimate factors of production in to wealth. In contrast, soft HRM places an emphasis on human side of things. The soft model focuses on treating employees as valued assets and a source of competitive advantage through their commitment, adaptability and high quality skill and performance (Legge, 1995).The Coca-Cola Company incorporates both hard HRM and soft HRM within their organization reflected in the Choice stumper adapted by Analoui (2002, p. 30). This model depicts a more holistic approach to HRM as seen in Figure 5 below.The Input Stage of HRM policies and frameworksThis model represents the communicatio n strategy with emphasis on HRM, being used by global organizations like Cola-Cola. It explains how the input stages of HRM policies are formulated at fourth-year management levels based on the knowledge and information attained from internal, own(prenominal) and external sources. These policies are then passed on to the functional and line management level where they are implemented, and finally ends at an output level that affects the individual, organisation and society bringing about, improved performance and effectiveness and quality of work life. This model proves effective as it takes into consideration the culture of the organization, as well as individual and stakeholders perception of the company and can be taken on an international basis for a company such as Coca-Cola.CONCLUSIONThis report critically reviews the corporate communication strategies being utilised within the Coca-Cola Company. It reflects on the nature, scope and focus of corporate communication, with em phasis on Human Resource Management and Employee Relations. It describes how corporate communication is essential for corporate image, identity and reputation to be understood by stakeholders. It explained how under the corporate communication strategy, Cola-Cola is able to formulate a more holistic approach to HR management, linking the needs of the internal stakeholders with those of its external stakeholders to achieve a more effective organization. Finally it concludes that company performance and efficiency is linked to the corporate communication strategy of an organization and how successful its implementation is.BibliographyAnaloui, F (2002) The ever-changing Patterns of HRM. UK Ashgate.Argenti, P.A. (1998) Corporate Communication. 2nd ed. Boston, MAIrwin McGraw-Hill.Beer, M. et al. (1984) Managing human assets. New York The Free adjureBratton, J. and Gold, J. (1999) Human Resource Management Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. capital of the United Kingdom MacMillan Press.Christe nsen, L.T., Cornelissen, J.P. and Morsing, M. (2007) Corporate communications and its receptions a comment on Llewellyn and Harrison. Human Relations journal, Vol. 60 (4), p.653-661.Cornelissen, J.P. (2008) Corporate Communication A Guide to Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. capital of the United Kingdom Sage Publications Ltd.Davis, K. (1960) Can business afford to ignore its social responsibility? California Managements Review, Vol. 2 (3), p. 70-76.Freeman, R.E. (1984) strategical Management AStakeholder ApproachBoston, MA PitmanFombrun, C.J. and Riel, C.B.M. van (2006) Essentials of Corporate Communications Implementing practices for effective reputation management. Dawsonera Online. Available at http//dawsonera.com Accessed 08 November 2009.Fombrun, C.J et al. (1984) Strategic Human Resource Management. New York John WileyGotsi, M and Wilson, A. (2001) Corporate reputation seeking a definition. Corporate Communications An International Journal, Vol. 6 (1), p. 24-30.Gray, E.R. and Bal mer, J.M.T. (1998) Managing Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation. Long Range Planning. Vol. 31 (5), p. 685-692Guest, D. E. (1990) Human resource management and the American dream. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 27 (4), p. 377-397.Heery, E and Noon, M. (2001) A Dictionary of Human Relations. Oxford Oxford University Press.Jones, M.H. (2000) Reputation as reservoir. Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 3(1), p. 21-29.Legge, K. (1995) Human Resource Management Rhetorics and Realities,Basingstoke Macmillan.Oliver, S. (1997) Corporate Communication Principles, Technique and Strategies. London Kogan Page.Parson, T. (1949)Essays in Sociological Theory pure and applied.New York Free Press.Riel, C.B.M. van (1995) Principles of Corporate communication. London PrenticeHall.Riel, C.B.M. van and Balmer, J.M.T. (1997) Corporate identity the concept, its measurement and management. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31 (5), p.340-355.Schmidt, K. (1995) The Quest for Corporate Identity. Lond on CassellSutherland, J. and Canwell, D. (2004) Key Concepts in Human Resource Management. New York Palgrave Macmillan.Taylor, M. (2000) Cultural variance as a challenge to global public relations a case study of Coca-Cola tainting alarm in Western Europe. Public Relations Review, Vol. 26, p. 277-293.Welch, M. and Jackson, P.R. (2007) Rethinking internal communication a stakeholder approach. Corporate Communications An International Journal, Vol. 12(2) p. 177-198.http//www.cokecorporateresponsibility.co.uk/index.html (2009) Online. Accessed 27 October 2009http//www.thecoca-colacompany.com.html (2009) Online. Accessed 15 October 2009