War and the City Essay Example for Free

contend and the City EssayPaintings and photographs argon plots of cunning. As such, it has always depicted life. It has establish a representation of reality. much importantly, it represents the time wherein these artists be living. They created what they know, and through the artists eyes and perspective, we are able to witness what theyve seen as if it was right in front of us. In this light, the three photographs confine war as the unifying theme. Although contraryly expressed, each depict portrays pain and helplessness, and with it a faint spark of hope for a better tomorrow. But the latter importee cannot be readily noticed at first glance of the picture. When we look at them, we yet see dismay and fright. They are a reminder of a life others were not able to witness, a threat for others. They displayed this in either symbolic or upfront manner, but they never failed to show the emotions involved. The striking residuum among these pictures, on the other hand, r esides on how they were presented. The first image by Goya made use of warm colorize and upfront action.Picassos painting used of a lot of symbols. Meanwhile, the 9/11 photograph captured a chip during the after shock of the attack. These images each feel a different perspective, taking war from various angles. In the end, they all say war is never pleasant. E really artist has a responsibility for every piece of art they render. More importantly, the artist who constantly depict the realities of war should be careful about their pieces. Unfortunately, paintings and photographs are whole kit of art, and are avenues for freedom of expression.It should not be constrained. But knowing that what they show in their works would either create or break their names as an artist can be very constraining. However, if they let themselves be taken by this constraint, and did not risk the consequences, them they would not have been able to become masters in their fields. In my perspective, I believe that the artists should really show the horror and brutality of war. We are at the age wherein being romantic and subtle are no longer the focus of art. truehearted and provocative pieces are more the trade of art today. However, given that the other two pieces were created during a different period, it does not mean that being upfront about war all started in recent history. contend is a fact of life, regardless of the time when they were created. It should not be covered with romanticized implications to depict war. There is no other way to present war as it is. We cannot define how it feels to be in the middle of one. We only have pictures to show us how is it like.It is the closest to reality as we can get, and it is a reality we have to face. There are a lot of things one can perceive from one piece of art depicting war. But I dont believe that these will promote violence for the audience. Usually, these pieces are present the set up of war, and the basic facts about it. It was not created to persuade others to resort to war, unless that was the underlying message and it was bluntly said. However, majority of these kinds of artworks only present facts, and are not usually political in nature.They are perspectives, concepts and ideas from the artists point of view. We dont always have to agree or disagree with them. A silent understanding would have been enough.Works CitedGuernica Testimony of War. universe Broadcasting Service. 1 April 2008 http//www. pbs. org/treasuresoftheworld/guernica/gmain. html. Third of May. Museo Nacional Del Prado. 1 April 2008 museoprado/mcu. es/i34. html. World Trade Center September 11, 2008. SHI. 1 April 2008 http//dmetcalfe. homestead. com/AMERICA2. html.